Practical solutions to cutting carbon | South East Farmer

Practical solutions to cutting carbon

Events Posted 12/04/22
Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of farming operations benefits the environment and business profitability. This was the clear message to more than 200 attendees at the Hutchinsons National Carbon Conference earlier this spring.

While farming was often criticised for its GHG emissions, delegates heard how the sector was pivotal to tackling climate change through improved efficiency and carbon sequestration.

It was still early days for carbon markets and financial incentives, but speakers said simple improvements to the carbon footprint made sound business sense and would help meet ambitious GHG targets.

NFU climate change adviser Dr Ceris Jones was confident UK agriculture could meet the union’s 2040 net zero ambition - 10 years earlier than the government’s target - through a concerted effort across different areas.

“There is no silver bullet to tackling GHGs. We need as many farmers as possible to do everything they can to reduce emissions per hectare and per tonne.

“Farmers can’t do this alone, so it’s great to see Hutchinsons grabbing this issue.”

Speakers highlighted the links between reducing emissions, efficiency and cost savings, and that on productive land, maximising yield helped reduce the carbon footprint per tonne.

“Many things we can do to reduce emissions make perfect business sense,” conference chairman Gary Mills-Thomas said.

But before making changes, he, and others, advised farms to assess their individual carbon situation to identify areas to focus on and provide a baseline to measure changes against. TerraMap Carbon and Omnia Carbon management offered an ideal means of doing this.

Areas to target

Nitrogen fertiliser was highlighted as a major contributor to the carbon footprint on arable farms, as its production and application accounted for around 60% of emissions, The Farm Carbon Toolkit’s Becky Willson said.

Fuel use and field operations accounted for 20%, while other fertilisers, lime, seed and crop protection made up the remainder.

“Although crop input emissions are the predominant factor, we still have to produce food, otherwise we risk exporting the problem.”

Improving nitrogen use efficiency was a great starting point for reducing emissions, that offered significant financial benefits given high fertiliser prices. Advice included more accurate application timing matched to crop requirement and greater consideration of fertiliser type used.

Dr Nigel Davies of Maltdoctor Ltd said “abated” nitrogen fertiliser offered significant carbon savings. As former director of sustainability for Muntons he embedded abated fertiliser use in supplier contracts, reducing the carbon footprint of the firm’s primary raw material by 32%, at no extra cost to growers. Coupled with reduced emissions in malting, Muntons had decarbonised by around 60% since 2010.

Soil health focus

While nitrogen often grabbed carbon headlines, the focus should be on soil, speakers said.

Hutchinsons head of soils Ian Robertson said well-managed healthy soil fulfilled four functions:

  • Plant production
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Filter and buffer water
  • Biological habitat and diversity

Healthy, well structured soil meant better crop rooting and improved nutrient use efficiency, potentially creating opportunities to reduce fertiliser applications while maximising yield. Healthy soils were also more resilient and could facilitate management changes that reduced carbon emissions, such as zero tillage, he said.

Helix Yorkshire farmer Nick Wilson said soil health underpinned any successful farm business. He explained how the farm’s move away from a plough/ power-harrow based system to strip tillage had dramatically improved soil health, resilience and carbon footprint.

Particular focus was on managing organic matter through applying manures and introducing mixed species cover crops.

Kent farmer Tom Sewell also moved to no-till within a concerted focus on protecting and enhancing soils across 600 ha managed for 15 landowners.

“Soil health underpins everything we do.”

Cover and catch crops, plus regular organic matter additions had been vital for feeding soil biology, retaining moisture, and improving structure and workability, he said.

Finances had benefitted too. Over three years, fertiliser use had been cut 10% annually from 300 kg N/ha, while maintaining yields, and fuel used for crop establishment had fallen to 8-10 litres/ha. He planned further reductions, potentially to 4 litres/ha, by purchasing a high capacity Horsch drill.

Soil carbon storage

Rothamsted’s Steve McGrath said soil was important for sequestering carbon, but soil type and land use affected its storage ‘capacity’.

Different soils had their own “saturation point” for soil organic carbon (SOC) and levels would gradually decrease if organic carbon inputs fell as material was degraded, he noted.

Soils with high clay or fine silt content were good at protecting SOC, as it became bound to mineral particles.


Tweets from @southeastfarmer